'Do not judge others and though shall not be judged'. A point in history when Presidents/Generals/Influential/Educated/Uneducated..fall trap to drawn out morals in the society to abide by,else to be deemed immature to the evolved circumstances, no matter what accomplished in life considered successful to their time, but to be ridiculed with the moral taboo unaccomplished deemed the ultimate bench mark for success/failure . How can one be judgemental to the point of final verdict, without travelling in the victims boat. Have I travelled along that identical path leading to this unintended circumstance, what would have I done different to judge someone into a category of victims!? Sometimes boggles my curiosity, though frequently letting my tongue loosen, without promptly imbibing in the rational outlined above, very well knowing its implications not to behave illiterate at this juncture of living into this life. The reasoning burst beyond a point when exploring the real influence or morality/righteousness in my life.
What is the reasoning for determining the share of an effort gained with an ideology 'have earned it'..would simplify my scrambled reasoning with this example. A poor 'responsible' father comes out of a bakery with a piece of sandwich for his hungry crying child, on to the street to see another starved stretching once arms to the point of collapse. What could be an ideal theoretical reasoning/explanation here, not to explain the research going into the verdict. What would be my reaction? The very fact in practice would be to give my 'earned' sandwich to my crying child and walk away ignoring the very needy starved behind. The irony comes when a camera mopes in the event and demonises me to the point of embarrassment without researching into my circumstances, is the world we live in/into. The society has come to a brink be developed/underdeveloped to take in the pleasure of ridiculing to rooting out the real cause, here the reasoning is simply made complicated, to the point of trying to balance out some event , without under standing what really takes to balance the balancing act. I tend to cherish it complicated to simplify it to be practical. The reasoning above is complete, when one has any moral value left within to judge the circumstance, be deemed religious/atheistic/practical/impractical. The above scenario dissected by a religious would say should share the piece, with the needy to make life more meaningful for all parties involved to lead by example. Driven by practical events, would say feed self to broaden out later if any left. When driven by a strong social equality/rationing philosophy would say, snatch his sandwich and give to the very deserving now. Thinking over the issue at hand a poor 'responsible father' in the first place, what works well is to be decided. Has the society at large have/has any moral guidelines for the scenario unfolding. If so should it be guided/driven with love/force is the choice to live in/into. How to make it work is left to the person/nation to decide..guided by what value/vision and which pole star to look at, in dangling scenarios is the reasoning choice to make and live into. A vision/mission blue printed/founded on abstract ideologues is better to be led by someone who believes/practices/practiced to make it relevant . As circumstances dictates the behaviour/action of an individual, being moulded with exposure, the key factor which determines the inclusiveness/exclusiveness of any outcome is imbibed contents with their limitations. Seldom simple practical applications resolved at its spark/cause, to be later dominated/analysed for its symptoms precipitating out. Explained/briefed to perfection, forgetting the simple action to be taken to fix the cause of the reaction and the cycle continues in the name of complexity, adding along in its cycle of simplicity to be encoded into its simple structural intent/content in the very first place. Who is fooling/exploiting whom becomes a common/simple !? Voice/visuals now cultured and modulated to be pleasing to once senses, guiding one into a judgement to practical real contents, to be further lost in the cycle of complexity to the real issue lost in the flattery, abstract, complex, superficial noice/murkiness used as a deterrent to be exploited/submerged into in the name of civilisation/technologies hum!! As rightly pointed out by my friend, one promptly falls into the category of solvent or the precipitate. As any sensible likes to be challenged into thinking, than to be told to do so, seems to be the key to the lock into rational reasoning.
Our world is driven by an ideology of attracting the flys with honey to vinegar, what is the real intention, who are the victims of the predator is as easy to locating anyone pulling a trigger on someones shoulders. Humanity seems need to experience into the pain of loss, prior to negotiation/reasoning.. likes the hard way experienced out first, to fit into the simple solution. Do I, realise the implications of my actions and reasoning or am I another victim drifting with the tide of circumstance to create no effect, but to be within an illusion of bubble perceived within, to be all happening for a good reason to evolve out with wings in time, drifting along with the flow of current hallucinating in a dream. We tend to be reasonable/sensitive to situations knowing the relevance/history of happening to what degree is the !? Ready to sacrifice in the name of beliefs/values to exploring deeper for meaningful harmony within, on which it was established in the very first place. Possessiveness/narrow mindedness is the key to majority of unreasonable evolved circumstances, encountered in our surroundings now, be for religious/economic reasoning. Life seems is to reason, without attempting to understand the magnitude of reasoning to be undertaken. To flow with the tide seems is to reason for the sake of reasoning, to the real solutions reasoning capacity has to undertakE.
What is the reasoning for determining the share of an effort gained with an ideology 'have earned it'..would simplify my scrambled reasoning with this example. A poor 'responsible' father comes out of a bakery with a piece of sandwich for his hungry crying child, on to the street to see another starved stretching once arms to the point of collapse. What could be an ideal theoretical reasoning/explanation here, not to explain the research going into the verdict. What would be my reaction? The very fact in practice would be to give my 'earned' sandwich to my crying child and walk away ignoring the very needy starved behind. The irony comes when a camera mopes in the event and demonises me to the point of embarrassment without researching into my circumstances, is the world we live in/into. The society has come to a brink be developed/underdeveloped to take in the pleasure of ridiculing to rooting out the real cause, here the reasoning is simply made complicated, to the point of trying to balance out some event , without under standing what really takes to balance the balancing act. I tend to cherish it complicated to simplify it to be practical. The reasoning above is complete, when one has any moral value left within to judge the circumstance, be deemed religious/atheistic/practical/impractical. The above scenario dissected by a religious would say should share the piece, with the needy to make life more meaningful for all parties involved to lead by example. Driven by practical events, would say feed self to broaden out later if any left. When driven by a strong social equality/rationing philosophy would say, snatch his sandwich and give to the very deserving now. Thinking over the issue at hand a poor 'responsible father' in the first place, what works well is to be decided. Has the society at large have/has any moral guidelines for the scenario unfolding. If so should it be guided/driven with love/force is the choice to live in/into. How to make it work is left to the person/nation to decide..guided by what value/vision and which pole star to look at, in dangling scenarios is the reasoning choice to make and live into. A vision/mission blue printed/founded on abstract ideologues is better to be led by someone who believes/practices/practiced to make it relevant . As circumstances dictates the behaviour/action of an individual, being moulded with exposure, the key factor which determines the inclusiveness/exclusiveness of any outcome is imbibed contents with their limitations. Seldom simple practical applications resolved at its spark/cause, to be later dominated/analysed for its symptoms precipitating out. Explained/briefed to perfection, forgetting the simple action to be taken to fix the cause of the reaction and the cycle continues in the name of complexity, adding along in its cycle of simplicity to be encoded into its simple structural intent/content in the very first place. Who is fooling/exploiting whom becomes a common/simple !? Voice/visuals now cultured and modulated to be pleasing to once senses, guiding one into a judgement to practical real contents, to be further lost in the cycle of complexity to the real issue lost in the flattery, abstract, complex, superficial noice/murkiness used as a deterrent to be exploited/submerged into in the name of civilisation/technologies hum!! As rightly pointed out by my friend, one promptly falls into the category of solvent or the precipitate. As any sensible likes to be challenged into thinking, than to be told to do so, seems to be the key to the lock into rational reasoning.
Our world is driven by an ideology of attracting the flys with honey to vinegar, what is the real intention, who are the victims of the predator is as easy to locating anyone pulling a trigger on someones shoulders. Humanity seems need to experience into the pain of loss, prior to negotiation/reasoning.. likes the hard way experienced out first, to fit into the simple solution. Do I, realise the implications of my actions and reasoning or am I another victim drifting with the tide of circumstance to create no effect, but to be within an illusion of bubble perceived within, to be all happening for a good reason to evolve out with wings in time, drifting along with the flow of current hallucinating in a dream. We tend to be reasonable/sensitive to situations knowing the relevance/history of happening to what degree is the !? Ready to sacrifice in the name of beliefs/values to exploring deeper for meaningful harmony within, on which it was established in the very first place. Possessiveness/narrow mindedness is the key to majority of unreasonable evolved circumstances, encountered in our surroundings now, be for religious/economic reasoning. Life seems is to reason, without attempting to understand the magnitude of reasoning to be undertaken. To flow with the tide seems is to reason for the sake of reasoning, to the real solutions reasoning capacity has to undertakE.
No comments:
Post a Comment