During this season of debating and mind boggling discussions on the future/economics/vision/mission.. happened to realise the relevance of two important factors pulling/separating people apart. Religion/Politics kind of intertwined together into majority of our reasoning. Mostly happening by chance, not by choice in this millennium of living into reasoning and scraping some ideologies together, towards a common discipline for living into. Once happened/happening out of blind reinforcement/force without really getting into the subject/matter. Now changing with time to immerse into, before picking once chances of getting involved. Kind of like shopping in a super market with a variety of choice to pick out from and what are the emulsifying ingredients which would help one pick something of need/want is what is being studied in marketing research to promote once chances. What is happening in the whole process is simply playing/dissecting/exploiting into the psychology of human mind. It becomes relevant only in an environment where there is supply/demand and the environmental factors running them favours it. As simple as smart phones are meant for developed to underdeveloped nations. What sells and penetrates into the mind of an individual is predetermined by a simple factor called circumstance in/into. This factor evolve out/change with time.
As usual, I end myself up into enchanted/undisputed areas of reasoning, in this season when nature is at its best to prove its stand and challenge humanity on their might and superiority over its trivial subjects surviving at its mear mercy. Hum!!the word mercy is a primitive feudalistic term coined to intimidate and sublime one to the other. Mutated with the test to time to blend into the circumstances/opportunity of insecurity. A common incident which is still perceived influencing the daily opinion of an individual is religion, deciding political course of a community/nation at large. Its sphere of influence again is undisputed beyond comprehension as the 'common faith' of an individual/community/nation dictating the course of its subjects at large. What is the basis of religion and its foundation and the course it takes towards dictating once future!?
Per my limited understanding of the term understanding proves my limitation into venturing beyond this horizon of reasoning,still thinks is worth the point. Religion in itself did not exist in its very premature stage, its relevance came into the picture when a need arouse as stared with circumstances/opportunity. What existed was simple understanding and the rational governing them was simply wrong/right. With the evolution of reasoning/curiosity a desire for quest bloomed into the evolving mind of humanity as to how life thrives and sustains. Comes up with two hypothesis one built on blind faith/second on reasoning and reproducibility of reasoning. The later termed as religion and the former science now. Both are perceived as oil/water immiscible but emulsified into the natural of a being as necessary by the majority, through abstract agents holding them together as love/faith/hope/trust which is the essence of humanity separating itself from the rest of the living breathing pact of life. This separation in itself breeds the ground for the next question what made it to happen so. With the control over morbidity/mortality, one built and transmitted over generation called belief, justifies the question pointing it to a supernatural omnipresent/omnipotent being and its survival justified vouched by millions in the name of supernatural miracles, which goes beyond human imagination and understanding. Anything non reproducible at a given moment questioned for evidences and formulas for reproducibility seaked by science, denying its limitations to explain the sudden change in behaviour/nature of well being within the personality. Religion bringing people together to a common ground of togetherness/oneness to science isolating individuals from the pact to venture into the unknown of riddles and puzzles and picked up by the few interested to built on towards another complexity. In the process worth reminding what is important and to what extent, which with time will any way dictate its own term. Human in collusion with the supernatural supersonic, trying to catch up with the unknown, as religion is built on a principle that the supernatural dwells in you/me and will lead the one who has a real aptitude/appetite for any curiosity focused on to a vision leading it to a mission built on a dream. One believing in itself termed science and the other trusting into a source to help it function termed religion. Majority falling into a blend of both.
My reasoning goes beyond this juncture to a common question arising, does one trust in God to do Gods will or trust in man to do Gods will. The mystery of religion evolves/ends at this juncture. Now the point to remind in the whole process is that religion is all about a second,third..chance its for the losers/beginners/achievers..interpreted further for them as hope/faith/expectations from the one much to the least. As once reached a position/altitude within the society ,will be eventually lifted up by the followers to stay afloat, in terms of intentional economics if be the objective thus be in science/religion. The means chosen towards determines the quality of the person to be picked up as a pole star, to be looked into towards this altitude achieved thus.
My quest went a step further, to establish what we perceive of religion and understanding of religion/politics. Further narrations will depict dialogues between myself and my friends on this unscratched topic goes thus.This election reminds me of 2 sons ..one says I will do it the way you want dad and does nothing, the other says no but does it eventually as his father wanted/expected from him. Whom do you vote for!? First response goes as ..'Depends what the father wants '. I threw in some more as ..Very tricky scenario.. Hum!! let's say in a 'normal' house what would/should a 'sensible' father expect from his children.. To be, caring/ peaceful /sharing/responsible OR to be, aggressive/cunning/possessive/self centered.. Is the choice to fill in, I guess!! came with another perspective..'Unfortunately you are asking to chose between one who doesn't keep his word and another who isn't sure of himself . Anyway I would vote for something that affects today and lasts eternity'. Understanding the gravity of the scenario pulled a bit further..Religion and politics should not mix, but in reality is the fact living into. Christ per my understanding did not start any political parties, as you rightly said he walked the talk. So be any catholic or other christian denominations, I don't understand, why should any Christians be so worried if practicing real Christianity be in any nation on this planet, be scared of issues arising of circumstances or changes.What happened to all his first disciples and followers,they are the real Christians not opportunists/politicians..they walked into theirs teachers talk right/wrong!? With changes /numbers added to the group now turned into an organisation, which once resisting and now doing the same things they were opposed too in the very beginning. First were against science/thinking/questioning..now flourishes institutions and encourages all the above mentioned. Who is doing what.. is the ?? in front of me and why??..per my pure understanding, as instructions given to his disciples, should not carry any wealth/hold on to any wealth/nor make any wealth nor encourage others to make wordily wealth and treasures ..Is it true or not..who does not have luxury/savings now..do what ever you want and then give 10% is the philosophy of some now I gUess, larger the amount in the percentile, bigger the eternity obtained for some. hUm!! not the means.. for some so called eternal disciples/followers in Christ. As far as eternity and today goes, eternity per my understanding is doing the right on a daily basis and right needs no justification or propaganda's to be ignited as flames/ fear. If institutions had/has any 'moral' authority over its subjects why struggle now. Speaking of morality how many christian families have more than 1/2/3 children's.. where /how did the remaining get lost.. meaning all its present subjects are !? and marriage, what was Christs reactions to great religious righteous people stoning her to death..Please may our religion not be so narrow minded and propagate things which eventually every one does within its system, and kill itself from his real intentions in the long run, and may it WALK THE TALK the rest will follow eventually. Shame that now his religion is forcing Christ to vote. Towards which I got another statement as..'Anything won't let me down for seeking and proclaiming HIS Love.Religion/politics comes secondary.But when it comes to a decision where it affects Life & Love for all the world, I will stand with one who stands for Life,love & its being to/in fullness.So its a decision of pure conscience that Christ's spirit/heart has instilled in us...'To which I replied..The issue is simple, please do not mix religion and politics. They are like oil and water..law of the land as far as is concerned now in any 'developed nations' stands/goes with all its citizens, be it gays/lesbians/liberals/conservatives..it does not matter..is the fact. Understood well by the Anglicans in advance, and see where it leads them into, when they mixed religion and politics..give what belongs to God and what belongs to .... is his teaching right , unless otherwise there is a second Messiah now in his place to be replaced for better sensible reality/practicality..my reasoning begins and ends there. I fully endorse your first sentence and may you be guided by it. The moment any religion spreads Gods, love/wisdom..with fearful pictures/hate speeches ..think its the start of its downfall/decline stage.. Christ did not come to spread hate/fear but spread hope/courage. Please note he did not stand by any parties..and I would expect spiritual leaders to be bipartisan.. not to vote for left/right..it send a wrong signal seeing.. Archbishops/bishops/priests standing in line to cast there votes..its equivalent to travelling with legs put into both boats..what was his teaching again..no man can serve both MAN/GOD..my reasoning again begins and ends there, if practicing in his walk the talk. Whom do they trust then.!? I got an interesting reply as..'Even though there is a separation of Church and state, in a pure sense, this is never possible. Look at past history including the fact as to how David was selected to the throne, to what happens around the world across different religions and cultures, politics and religion are intertwined, like it or not. Saying that faith that leads to trust in GOD and man are for two different things. Voting for election is for an administrative head of a country, who technically will bring humanly leadership on this geographical location. Priests are exercising their right to voice their opinion just as any lay person to exercise this leadership. This has nothing to with whom they trust in or pray too or ask spiritual guidance. Remember, both Church and state are equally capable of governance and both are built for this'. Towards which I taught the theory of hierarchy is proven right again when concluding with governance/control as the objective of both. Further continued on.. I honestly dream for a day when religious leaders understand their literal vocation in life, in its puristic impractical sense and walk in his/her talk. Very clear as oil/ water no man can serve both God/ Man . Become/choose one is my prayer/dream. Reasoning is limited again per my understanding ..say for example priest xyz stood in line and voted for Tom/Dick/Harry assuming they win with their endorsement to a degree, Tom/Dick/Harry after getting elected does falter in their promises made to get elected.. Who will take up the responsibility.. Surly the man who endorsed/voted for them right!! Does it happen in reality!? So let's leave religion where it should belong, to begin simply without further complication.
What is clearly being understood after a brief conversation is, we the people understand things in a complicated incomplete manner. Some exploit this opportunity of half backed ideologies and dilute the simple very ideology/philosophy of religion/politics..and as its concepts spread to many, later left to a smart dominant gifted interpreter to his will/interpretation, baked further into a complex sweet delicacy of complexity, with subjects blinking/nodding once head sometimes/often to the point of bloodshed/argument. Losing the simple ideology in the eventual transfer of information amongst the many as Chinese whisper, eventually left without understanding the real simple intention. All religions are built on simple abstract/intangible ideologies, later being perceived sensitive simple issues where sensitivity dominates rooting out the simplicity from the equation, always starting with the pure intention of practicality possibility in mind, to be transferred over/applied with sacrifice and swallow of a trait called ego to majority excess wants/needs, well knowing its limitations/potential. As to simplify no longer to the full definition of think being defined as, ask is it.. true/helpful/inspiring/necessary/kind. The reasoning and blending of the immiscible begins and ends there, simply explainable as, am I the source/the reflecting object which the word emulsification is all about, to bring in the different together with binding agents added, think over again and ask self am I the.. solute/solvent/emulsifying agent for a common purpose/usE.
.
As usual, I end myself up into enchanted/undisputed areas of reasoning, in this season when nature is at its best to prove its stand and challenge humanity on their might and superiority over its trivial subjects surviving at its mear mercy. Hum!!the word mercy is a primitive feudalistic term coined to intimidate and sublime one to the other. Mutated with the test to time to blend into the circumstances/opportunity of insecurity. A common incident which is still perceived influencing the daily opinion of an individual is religion, deciding political course of a community/nation at large. Its sphere of influence again is undisputed beyond comprehension as the 'common faith' of an individual/community/nation dictating the course of its subjects at large. What is the basis of religion and its foundation and the course it takes towards dictating once future!?
Per my limited understanding of the term understanding proves my limitation into venturing beyond this horizon of reasoning,still thinks is worth the point. Religion in itself did not exist in its very premature stage, its relevance came into the picture when a need arouse as stared with circumstances/opportunity. What existed was simple understanding and the rational governing them was simply wrong/right. With the evolution of reasoning/curiosity a desire for quest bloomed into the evolving mind of humanity as to how life thrives and sustains. Comes up with two hypothesis one built on blind faith/second on reasoning and reproducibility of reasoning. The later termed as religion and the former science now. Both are perceived as oil/water immiscible but emulsified into the natural of a being as necessary by the majority, through abstract agents holding them together as love/faith/hope/trust which is the essence of humanity separating itself from the rest of the living breathing pact of life. This separation in itself breeds the ground for the next question what made it to happen so. With the control over morbidity/mortality, one built and transmitted over generation called belief, justifies the question pointing it to a supernatural omnipresent/omnipotent being and its survival justified vouched by millions in the name of supernatural miracles, which goes beyond human imagination and understanding. Anything non reproducible at a given moment questioned for evidences and formulas for reproducibility seaked by science, denying its limitations to explain the sudden change in behaviour/nature of well being within the personality. Religion bringing people together to a common ground of togetherness/oneness to science isolating individuals from the pact to venture into the unknown of riddles and puzzles and picked up by the few interested to built on towards another complexity. In the process worth reminding what is important and to what extent, which with time will any way dictate its own term. Human in collusion with the supernatural supersonic, trying to catch up with the unknown, as religion is built on a principle that the supernatural dwells in you/me and will lead the one who has a real aptitude/appetite for any curiosity focused on to a vision leading it to a mission built on a dream. One believing in itself termed science and the other trusting into a source to help it function termed religion. Majority falling into a blend of both.
My reasoning goes beyond this juncture to a common question arising, does one trust in God to do Gods will or trust in man to do Gods will. The mystery of religion evolves/ends at this juncture. Now the point to remind in the whole process is that religion is all about a second,third..chance its for the losers/beginners/achievers..interpreted further for them as hope/faith/expectations from the one much to the least. As once reached a position/altitude within the society ,will be eventually lifted up by the followers to stay afloat, in terms of intentional economics if be the objective thus be in science/religion. The means chosen towards determines the quality of the person to be picked up as a pole star, to be looked into towards this altitude achieved thus.
My quest went a step further, to establish what we perceive of religion and understanding of religion/politics. Further narrations will depict dialogues between myself and my friends on this unscratched topic goes thus.This election reminds me of 2 sons ..one says I will do it the way you want dad and does nothing, the other says no but does it eventually as his father wanted/expected from him. Whom do you vote for!? First response goes as ..'Depends what the father wants '. I threw in some more as ..Very tricky scenario.. Hum!! let's say in a 'normal' house what would/should a 'sensible' father expect from his children.. To be, caring/ peaceful /sharing/responsible OR to be, aggressive/cunning/possessive/self centered.. Is the choice to fill in, I guess!! came with another perspective..'Unfortunately you are asking to chose between one who doesn't keep his word and another who isn't sure of himself . Anyway I would vote for something that affects today and lasts eternity'. Understanding the gravity of the scenario pulled a bit further..Religion and politics should not mix, but in reality is the fact living into. Christ per my understanding did not start any political parties, as you rightly said he walked the talk. So be any catholic or other christian denominations, I don't understand, why should any Christians be so worried if practicing real Christianity be in any nation on this planet, be scared of issues arising of circumstances or changes.What happened to all his first disciples and followers,they are the real Christians not opportunists/politicians..they walked into theirs teachers talk right/wrong!? With changes /numbers added to the group now turned into an organisation, which once resisting and now doing the same things they were opposed too in the very beginning. First were against science/thinking/questioning..now flourishes institutions and encourages all the above mentioned. Who is doing what.. is the ?? in front of me and why??..per my pure understanding, as instructions given to his disciples, should not carry any wealth/hold on to any wealth/nor make any wealth nor encourage others to make wordily wealth and treasures ..Is it true or not..who does not have luxury/savings now..do what ever you want and then give 10% is the philosophy of some now I gUess, larger the amount in the percentile, bigger the eternity obtained for some. hUm!! not the means.. for some so called eternal disciples/followers in Christ. As far as eternity and today goes, eternity per my understanding is doing the right on a daily basis and right needs no justification or propaganda's to be ignited as flames/ fear. If institutions had/has any 'moral' authority over its subjects why struggle now. Speaking of morality how many christian families have more than 1/2/3 children's.. where /how did the remaining get lost.. meaning all its present subjects are !? and marriage, what was Christs reactions to great religious righteous people stoning her to death..Please may our religion not be so narrow minded and propagate things which eventually every one does within its system, and kill itself from his real intentions in the long run, and may it WALK THE TALK the rest will follow eventually. Shame that now his religion is forcing Christ to vote. Towards which I got another statement as..'Anything won't let me down for seeking and proclaiming HIS Love.Religion/politics comes secondary.But when it comes to a decision where it affects Life & Love for all the world, I will stand with one who stands for Life,love & its being to/in fullness.So its a decision of pure conscience that Christ's spirit/heart has instilled in us...'To which I replied..The issue is simple, please do not mix religion and politics. They are like oil and water..law of the land as far as is concerned now in any 'developed nations' stands/goes with all its citizens, be it gays/lesbians/liberals/conservatives..it does not matter..is the fact. Understood well by the Anglicans in advance, and see where it leads them into, when they mixed religion and politics..give what belongs to God and what belongs to .... is his teaching right , unless otherwise there is a second Messiah now in his place to be replaced for better sensible reality/practicality..my reasoning begins and ends there. I fully endorse your first sentence and may you be guided by it. The moment any religion spreads Gods, love/wisdom..with fearful pictures/hate speeches ..think its the start of its downfall/decline stage.. Christ did not come to spread hate/fear but spread hope/courage. Please note he did not stand by any parties..and I would expect spiritual leaders to be bipartisan.. not to vote for left/right..it send a wrong signal seeing.. Archbishops/bishops/priests standing in line to cast there votes..its equivalent to travelling with legs put into both boats..what was his teaching again..no man can serve both MAN/GOD..my reasoning again begins and ends there, if practicing in his walk the talk. Whom do they trust then.!? I got an interesting reply as..'Even though there is a separation of Church and state, in a pure sense, this is never possible. Look at past history including the fact as to how David was selected to the throne, to what happens around the world across different religions and cultures, politics and religion are intertwined, like it or not. Saying that faith that leads to trust in GOD and man are for two different things. Voting for election is for an administrative head of a country, who technically will bring humanly leadership on this geographical location. Priests are exercising their right to voice their opinion just as any lay person to exercise this leadership. This has nothing to with whom they trust in or pray too or ask spiritual guidance. Remember, both Church and state are equally capable of governance and both are built for this'. Towards which I taught the theory of hierarchy is proven right again when concluding with governance/control as the objective of both. Further continued on.. I honestly dream for a day when religious leaders understand their literal vocation in life, in its puristic impractical sense and walk in his/her talk. Very clear as oil/ water no man can serve both God/ Man . Become/choose one is my prayer/dream. Reasoning is limited again per my understanding ..say for example priest xyz stood in line and voted for Tom/Dick/Harry assuming they win with their endorsement to a degree, Tom/Dick/Harry after getting elected does falter in their promises made to get elected.. Who will take up the responsibility.. Surly the man who endorsed/voted for them right!! Does it happen in reality!? So let's leave religion where it should belong, to begin simply without further complication.
What is clearly being understood after a brief conversation is, we the people understand things in a complicated incomplete manner. Some exploit this opportunity of half backed ideologies and dilute the simple very ideology/philosophy of religion/politics..and as its concepts spread to many, later left to a smart dominant gifted interpreter to his will/interpretation, baked further into a complex sweet delicacy of complexity, with subjects blinking/nodding once head sometimes/often to the point of bloodshed/argument. Losing the simple ideology in the eventual transfer of information amongst the many as Chinese whisper, eventually left without understanding the real simple intention. All religions are built on simple abstract/intangible ideologies, later being perceived sensitive simple issues where sensitivity dominates rooting out the simplicity from the equation, always starting with the pure intention of practicality possibility in mind, to be transferred over/applied with sacrifice and swallow of a trait called ego to majority excess wants/needs, well knowing its limitations/potential. As to simplify no longer to the full definition of think being defined as, ask is it.. true/helpful/inspiring/necessary/kind. The reasoning and blending of the immiscible begins and ends there, simply explainable as, am I the source/the reflecting object which the word emulsification is all about, to bring in the different together with binding agents added, think over again and ask self am I the.. solute/solvent/emulsifying agent for a common purpose/usE.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment