attItUde

    'Ask you will receive,seek you will find,knock and the door will be opened to tee'. A teaching put in simple words and interpreted into many ways, to suite the needs of circumstance. Attitude/personality built and molded through exposure, not by once choice but by situations into. Could it be family/school/believes/work environment/national opportunity, which would carve the attitude of an individual into perceived acceptable/unacceptable character. Realizing well, that we live in a world which is still evolving out of its stereotype into the perceived Utopian era.
    Be developed/developing/underdeveloped category one might fall into, in terms of once material/physical/mental capacity, stitched up together with vision/strife built in an attitude developed primarily of circumstances. To be developed to be acceptable, within the pretext of constitutional phrases/treaties achieved now being molded into an attitude acceptable by some to others, to be evolved for the better meaning simply an open mind to imbibe in and develop for the larger good, as an opportunity to excel is left void even in the best of best circumstances is being simple human. One still live in a pool where we still experience the  facts of living into. A society visioned for all race/gender/colour/believes in reality to experience, when filling in an application form be for an appointment/travel/promotion. Why then the need of these questions, if built on a fair system!? Is what the practical challenges are, as an individual is constrained into to develop an acceptable attitude. Oh! sorry its for our statistical records!! Our society is on the verge of progress for some eligible earned few at the expense of the major majority, with room for development even in the perceived best is the reality. One still live in a society where/when  the string is snapped prematurely, the reasoning is simple of stress/not tuned to withstand, the reasoning to the cause/events into being  analysed, if only falling into the lucky few minority, to be later stretched for the first few again, to be trickled down if absolutely pushed into for is the sad attitude of our being into again and again, in the name of democracy/constitution/vision/mission. RelationShips broken/bridged based on developed attitude/understanding within on perceived understanding of a vowel-less word 'my' legal rights/due/authority.Cos one was trained into within this attitude to attempting understanding/exploring anything else be literary/scientific.
    Was humbled recently to witness events/understandings where we are often skeptics to changes, when knowing well circumstances need a change which is the right attitude worth standing and support towards. We often shy away and stand strong in our current understanding/flow of the perceived wrong. Was witnessing events run in the name of togetherness, where there is no dispute on investments to pile up infrastructure, but skepticism encountered from all  towards the common right to make a change in the life of the needful/deserving. Have gathered enough will/determination to spend thousands towards a smoke screen towards a few minute stage show, than towards a common good will act to create an impact on the unfortunate deserving many. To come up with very polished statements as non-profit organisations/underfunded and the list goes on. To witness the few interested even keeping silent to the statement unfolding to posture on with a silent educated gesture of nothingness. Often to wonder why to be educated if to be quiet for a worthy cause/mission. Often our minds are pushed against a wall of silent ignorance to pro-activeness in such situations when in authority to be the catalyst for the change. May be due to fear/ego/recognition complexities or  an inner instinct of why is he/she coming up with something which is not expected from their stature/level. In the process delaying the right and grooming the wrong to explode as a bubble within self/family/community with the simple factor  we call/understand as the time.
    Reading a statement which went on to say, 'Be careful with your words, once they are said they can only be forgiven, but not forgotten'. To see a post on a popular social gathering/sharing platform posted by a honest person, expecting to see good happen through/from the government, a cartoon depicting trickle down effect of funding,  finally reaching the end users in drops to a pale of bucket handed over to be utelised for the larger good, eroded mainstream in corruption/bureaucracy. Irony being re-posted by the common within a system forced to practice ignorantly/knowingly the same in the name of perceived goodness. Kind of trowing stones at someone living in a glass house. Reported back knowing well could/would be potentially branded now as communist/socialist/capitalist used often to get around once means  stating.. Is it not the same in most of our established institutions, erected in the name of God/Saints/Humble persons grown  now into the structural complexity of a corporation, seeking the co-operation/support of the majority ignorant to whip up once vanity/fancies. How are we any different to them in our actions/mission drives, derived out of a theoretical abstract understanding !?.. Starting with our schools/hospitals/colleges the version above is then the translation of the training exposed/experienced to a larger extent being extrapolated to live/cherish into, which cannot be ruled out often when seeking clarity. Is it truE/falsE!?
    Our choices are limited mostly, sometimes solutions are kind of giving medicine to an ailing child, rejecting may be on its texture/taste, so meaning should we on the rights of the individual kid stop giving the medicine all together as an individual/community!? as always there is a room for improvement, adding in choices to make it acceptable is the fact learned/taught by such unintended circumstances. Once attitude again is being reflected correctly on the emptiness/fullness of the glass into. So is it training/environment into, helping one to focus/act in a manner!? One flocking together only for a reason, may be expecting better economic/security reason, as shown by nature living on land/air/water.. all flocking together, individually different but together into an acceptable attitude to propel ahead into unknown destiny. We live in an environment where the majority 90% perceived incapable driven/exploited  by the perceived capable 10%  an attitude built on what cost/ratio!? one mostly born into a circumstance by chance,kind of picking a lotto ticket. What are the odds of making it better into, is what the community/nation has to work towards to segregating/classifying its citizens. An environmental attitude now drawn and realised that one has to strive and push harder to accomplish something called material security in life, to be acceptable into the top percentile, built on hard work/dedication/patience/luck. Results accepted by the bottom majority percentile ,kind of digging once own grave is the reality of once circumstantial environment again, the exploited giving simple authority  to be exploited again in the name of a delusional ideology/dream to be accomplished. How far one has to develop in once attitude to define success, seems to be drawn per once attitudinal character. Is accomplishment all about only material accomplishment, ruling out the other equations as mental/emotional attitude to be humane in the living breathing kingdom!? Seems now humanity rewards/acknowledges only the new ideas/innovators to be acceptable to be worth paid for, rather than to be in the majority to make it into a reality to see it unfold, is the irony where the first cell of attitude begins and ends.
    Our attitude at present is kind of drawn on this platform, ending with a repeated comment heard on a daily basis be at school/social gatherings..please come to the front and sit, a casual/common comment made very often, sometimes with force/vigor/humor. Why I often wonder, when the space is designed for all to hear/see from all angle once within the designated space. One sometimes feel betrayed/disillusioned where the architectural beauty speaks volume to be lost/left aside, if in the front of the group hum!! An attitude to be built, expecting none from others but all by self seems is an abstract/obsolete vision. Any way attitude is a relative inner spirit, kind of like the invisible sudden spark, which helps start an engine to propel ahead, to be built on an objective/purpose to derive/deliver an outcome. An attitude being built on, challenged to think to being told how to, has now proven to have succeeded and is the only mantra to our evolving destiny of attitudE.

reasonIng

    'Do not judge others and though shall not be judged'. A point in history when Presidents/Generals/Influential/Educated/Uneducated..fall trap to drawn out morals in the society to abide by,else to be deemed immature to the evolved circumstances, no matter what accomplished in  life considered successful to their time, but to be ridiculed with the moral taboo unaccomplished deemed the ultimate bench mark for success/failure . How can one be judgemental to the point of final verdict, without travelling in the victims boat. Have I travelled along that identical  path leading to this unintended circumstance, what would have I done different to judge someone into a category of victims!? Sometimes boggles my curiosity, though frequently letting my tongue loosen, without promptly imbibing in the rational outlined above, very well knowing its implications not to behave illiterate at this juncture of living into this life. The reasoning burst beyond a point when exploring the real influence or morality/righteousness in my life.
    What is the reasoning for determining the share of an effort gained with an ideology 'have earned it'..would simplify my scrambled reasoning with this example. A poor 'responsible' father comes out of a bakery with a piece of  sandwich for his hungry crying child, on to the street to see another starved stretching once arms to the point of collapse. What could be an ideal theoretical reasoning/explanation here, not to explain the research going into the verdict. What would be my reaction? The very fact in practice would be to give my 'earned' sandwich  to my crying child and walk away ignoring the very needy starved behind. The irony comes when a camera mopes in the event and demonises me to the point of embarrassment without researching into my circumstances, is the world we live in/into. The society has come to a brink be developed/underdeveloped to take in the pleasure of ridiculing to rooting out the real cause, here the reasoning is simply made complicated, to the point of trying to balance out some event , without under standing what really takes to balance the balancing act.  I tend to cherish it complicated to simplify it to be  practical. The reasoning above is complete, when one has any moral value left within to judge the circumstance, be deemed religious/atheistic/practical/impractical. The above scenario dissected by a religious would say should share the piece, with the needy to make life more meaningful for all parties involved to lead by example. Driven by practical events, would say feed self to broaden out later if any left. When driven by a strong social equality/rationing philosophy would say, snatch his sandwich and give to the very deserving now. Thinking over the issue at hand a poor 'responsible father' in the first place, what works well is to be decided. Has the society at large have/has any moral guidelines for the scenario unfolding. If so should it be guided/driven with love/force is the choice to live in/into. How to make it work is left to the person/nation to decide..guided by what value/vision and which pole star to look at, in dangling scenarios is the reasoning choice to make and live into. A vision/mission blue printed/founded on abstract ideologues is better to be led by someone who believes/practices/practiced to make it relevant . As circumstances dictates the behaviour/action of an individual, being moulded with exposure, the key factor which determines the inclusiveness/exclusiveness of  any outcome is imbibed contents with their limitations. Seldom simple practical applications resolved at its spark/cause, to be later dominated/analysed for its symptoms precipitating out. Explained/briefed to perfection, forgetting the simple action to be taken to fix the cause of the reaction and the cycle continues in the name of complexity, adding along in its cycle of simplicity to be encoded into its simple structural intent/content in the very first place. Who is fooling/exploiting whom becomes a common/simple !? Voice/visuals now cultured and modulated to be pleasing to once senses, guiding one into a judgement to practical real contents, to be further lost in the cycle of complexity to the real issue lost in the flattery, abstract, complex, superficial noice/murkiness used as a deterrent to be exploited/submerged into in the name of civilisation/technologies hum!! As rightly pointed out by my friend, one promptly falls into the category of solvent or the precipitate. As any sensible likes to be challenged into thinking, than to be told to do so, seems to be the key to the lock into rational reasoning.
    Our world is driven by an ideology of attracting the flys with honey to vinegar, what is the real intention, who are the victims of the predator is as easy to locating anyone pulling a trigger on someones shoulders. Humanity seems need to experience into the pain of loss, prior to negotiation/reasoning.. likes the hard way experienced out first, to fit into the simple solution. Do I, realise the implications of my actions and reasoning or am I another victim  drifting with the tide of circumstance to create no effect, but to be within an illusion of bubble perceived within, to be all happening for a good reason to evolve out  with wings in time, drifting along with the flow of current hallucinating in a dream. We tend to be reasonable/sensitive  to situations knowing the relevance/history of happening to what degree is the !? Ready to sacrifice in the name of beliefs/values to exploring deeper for meaningful harmony within, on which it was established in the very first place. Possessiveness/narrow mindedness is the key to majority of unreasonable evolved circumstances, encountered in our surroundings now, be for religious/economic reasoning. Life seems is to reason, without attempting to understand the magnitude of reasoning to be undertaken. To flow with the tide seems is to reason for the sake of reasoning, to the real solutions reasoning capacity has to undertakE.  

rUnning..

    I saw few people running together on my way to the church this Sunday, looked like a marathon race, as is common in this part of the globe to run for a cause. The cause is the point which sometimes boggles my mind, is it for self toning or really for the intended intention running for/into. In this season when the nation is set to choose a new leadership/continue with the vision established by the incumbent. I wonder often when seeing people always liking to take in anything new easily, falling victims easily in the name of  change. As beyond a point is like seeing large flocks taking the escalator/lifts  to stairs and running on the treadmills for hours together in the name of fitness/marketing!? Dreaming/expecting others to clear once thorny path, and later find time for burning out in the name of stress/obesity visible as  hanging out as excess/mass of unwanted flesh. Not disputing in the creation, some built into thus of no real intention/choice but born thus, the stink comes when the normal ready to get under the knife to be a doll/idol model. What is the real intent/cause one is really running for/into!? Kind of, do I really know/think what is the real objective/vision.. Am, I just one flowing/following in the tide.
    Some running propaganda's/reminding its flocks on grounds of intangible abstract ideologies,  seldom witnessing thyself, to a majority in the name of  someone, who walked in the talk, doing and establishing nothing material to touch, but to live on by/into. For instance seeing the media running advertisement in the name of someone yet to be born, funded in abundance to save life of the unborn in the name of religious principles/followers drawn out of its teachings wonder often.Very true not to support killing any life at/in any stage of development."Though shall not  kill"  agreed. How much media/religious attention/awakening happen in reality, for the ones living baked/stoned to starvation/poverty on our streets/neighbourhood on a daily living basis!? Are we as a community blind to the living and righteous/just to the unborn only!? I think it makes  perfect practical economical sense, to think and act for things to happen to the happening around hUm!!
    Whilst seeing the interested few speaking on these real issues ,streamlined aside as saints/irritants and left aside to capitalise on later after their tenure. A common reasoning would then be please pledge a  % of the savings to his teaching, where he justifies one given with a whole heart without compulsion/force/fear ..is what as you rightly said our teacher is all about. The past old revived/revised for the future, to a new teaching by himself showing by walking in the talking. Not just by collecting and to see the collecting ones living in palaces ,driving around immersed into all new luxuries/technologies possible. One can serve either the old/new as no man can serve 2 ideologies is the new teaching. Sail on one boat focusing on the new, will less complicate once path and others to follow by. The old is for references for the mistakes made, now being transformed into the present new. The new precisely teaches simply without much theologies, that it is in simplified living we grow as humans, showing us that the honey/food gets sweeter and meaningful in sharing as explained to us by the bees/ants, much more is expected from whom is given most/much, love your neighbor as self, is the person dealing with at the moment, let your right know not what the left gives, and finally the one to be the first should be the last..are some new simple teachings. Those who practice how do/can  we classify them..Oh! its simple we can classify them as ..capitalists/communists/socialists/liberals/conservatives/right/left/independent/spiritual/saints/prophets hum!? With only a classic example, left from his life time on multiplication of needs, teaching/showing to live into within the limitation within, asked to live into by having faith in him, left with only A single prayer to remind self  in tribulations to a majority who had/has built as big as bigger can be. Which is now being recited, with mind blogging aesthetics, by carving them into golden plates and being put aside to worship, is the reality living now into, to following knowing well there is always a second,third,endless opportunity to get it right per its holistic principle. Dreaming for a day when our leaders, will make us walk in their talk, keeping change in their mind and lead with strong moral principles to guide their path. Worth remind to self to follow in the path of truth and righteousness, to an illusion created without understanding/studying the reality at hand.
    In fact the reality of one running in/for any causes, the reasoning is simple.. when one is in no moral power/control to do what is right, finds a way out of it, to impress the bystanders/common folks. Later hiding and shrinking into doing exactly what is perceived inside as wrong/imperfect. At the end to continue running into the cycle of the old, to come out with an outcome of  old wine in the new labelled bottlE.

emUlsification..

    During this season of debating and mind boggling discussions on the future/economics/vision/mission.. happened to realise the relevance of two important factors pulling/separating people apart. Religion/Politics kind of intertwined together into majority of our reasoning. Mostly happening by chance, not by choice in this millennium of living into reasoning and scraping some ideologies together, towards a common discipline for living into. Once happened/happening out of  blind reinforcement/force without  really getting into the subject/matter. Now changing with time to immerse into, before picking once chances of getting involved. Kind of like shopping in a super market with a variety of choice to pick out from and what are the emulsifying ingredients which would help one pick something of need/want is what is being studied in marketing research to promote once chances. What is happening in the whole process is simply playing/dissecting/exploiting into the psychology of human mind. It becomes relevant only in an environment where there is supply/demand and the environmental factors running them favours it. As simple as smart phones are meant for developed to underdeveloped nations. What sells and penetrates into the mind of an individual is predetermined by a simple factor called circumstance in/into. This factor  evolve out/change with time.
    As usual, I end myself up into enchanted/undisputed  areas of reasoning, in this season when nature is at its best to prove its stand and challenge humanity on their might and superiority over  its trivial subjects surviving at its mear mercy. Hum!!the word mercy is a primitive feudalistic term coined to intimidate and sublime one to the other. Mutated with the test to time to blend into the circumstances/opportunity of insecurity. A common incident  which is still perceived influencing the daily opinion of an individual is religion, deciding political course of a community/nation at large. Its sphere of influence again is undisputed beyond comprehension as the 'common faith' of an individual/community/nation dictating the course of its subjects at large. What is the basis of religion and its foundation and the course it takes towards dictating once future!?
    Per my limited understanding of the term understanding proves my limitation into venturing beyond this horizon of reasoning,still thinks is worth the point. Religion in itself did not exist in its very premature stage, its relevance came into the picture when a need arouse as stared with circumstances/opportunity. What existed was simple understanding and the rational governing them was simply wrong/right. With the evolution of reasoning/curiosity a desire for quest bloomed into the evolving mind of humanity as to how life thrives and sustains. Comes up with two hypothesis one built on blind faith/second on reasoning and reproducibility of reasoning. The later termed as religion and the former science now. Both are perceived as oil/water immiscible but emulsified into the natural of a being as necessary by the majority, through abstract agents holding them together as love/faith/hope/trust which is the essence of humanity separating itself from the rest of the living breathing pact of life. This separation in itself breeds the ground for the next question what made it to happen so. With the control over morbidity/mortality, one built and transmitted over generation called belief, justifies the question pointing it to a supernatural omnipresent/omnipotent  being and its survival justified vouched by millions in the name of supernatural miracles, which goes beyond human imagination and understanding. Anything non reproducible at a given moment questioned for evidences and formulas for reproducibility seaked by science, denying its limitations to explain the sudden  change in behaviour/nature of well being within the personality. Religion bringing people together to a common ground of togetherness/oneness to science isolating individuals from the pact to venture into the unknown of riddles and puzzles and picked up by the few interested to built on towards another complexity. In the process worth reminding what is important and to what extent, which with time will any way dictate its own term. Human in collusion with the supernatural supersonic, trying to catch up with the unknown, as religion is built on a principle that the supernatural dwells in you/me and will lead the one who has a real aptitude/appetite for any curiosity focused on to a vision leading it to a mission built on a dream. One believing in itself termed science and the other trusting into a source to help it function termed religion. Majority falling into a blend of both.
    My reasoning goes beyond this juncture to a common question arising, does one trust in God to do Gods will or trust in man to do Gods will. The mystery of religion evolves/ends at this juncture. Now the point to remind in the whole process is that religion is all about a second,third..chance its for the losers/beginners/achievers..interpreted further for them as hope/faith/expectations from the one much to the least. As once reached a  position/altitude within the society ,will be eventually lifted up by the followers to stay afloat, in terms of intentional economics if be the objective thus be in science/religion. The means chosen towards determines the quality of the person to be picked up as a pole star, to be looked into towards this altitude achieved thus.
    My quest went a step further, to establish what we perceive of religion and understanding of religion/politics. Further narrations will depict dialogues between myself and my friends on this unscratched topic goes thus.This election reminds me of 2 sons ..one says I will do it the way you want dad and does nothing, the other says no but does it eventually as his father wanted/expected from him. Whom do you vote for!?  First response goes as ..'Depends what the father wants '. I threw in some more as ..Very tricky scenario.. Hum!! let's say in a 'normal' house what would/should a 'sensible' father expect from his children.. To be, caring/ peaceful /sharing/responsible OR to be, aggressive/cunning/possessive/self centered.. Is the choice to fill in, I guess!! came with another perspective..'Unfortunately you are asking to chose between one who doesn't keep his word and another who isn't sure of himself . Anyway I would vote for something that affects today and lasts eternity'. Understanding the gravity of the scenario pulled a bit  further..Religion and politics should not mix, but in reality is the fact living into. Christ per my understanding did not start any political parties, as you rightly said he walked the talk. So be any catholic or other christian denominations, I don't understand, why should any Christians be so worried if practicing real Christianity be in any nation on this planet, be scared of issues arising of circumstances or changes.What happened to all his first disciples and followers,they are the real Christians not opportunists/politicians..they walked into theirs teachers talk right/wrong!? With changes /numbers added to the group now turned into an organisation, which once resisting and now doing the same things they were opposed too in the very beginning. First were against science/thinking/questioning..now flourishes institutions and encourages all the above mentioned. Who is doing what.. is the ?? in front of me and why??..per my pure understanding, as instructions given to his disciples, should not carry any wealth/hold on to any wealth/nor make any wealth nor encourage others to make wordily wealth and treasures ..Is it true or not..who does not have luxury/savings now..do what ever you want and then give 10% is the philosophy of some now I gUess, larger the amount in the percentile, bigger the eternity obtained for some. hUm!! not the means.. for some so called eternal disciples/followers in Christ. As far as eternity and today goes, eternity per my understanding is doing the right on a daily basis and right needs no justification or propaganda's to be ignited as flames/ fear. If institutions had/has any 'moral' authority over its subjects why struggle now. Speaking of morality how many christian families have more than 1/2/3 children's.. where /how did the remaining get lost.. meaning all its present subjects are !? and marriage, what was Christs reactions to great religious righteous people stoning her to death..Please may our religion not be so narrow minded and propagate things which eventually every one does within its system, and kill itself  from his real intentions in the long run, and may it WALK THE TALK the rest will follow eventually. Shame that now his religion is forcing Christ to vote. Towards which I got another statement as..'Anything won't let me down for seeking and proclaiming HIS Love.Religion/politics comes secondary.But when it comes to a decision where it affects Life & Love for all the world, I will stand with one who stands for Life,love & its being to/in fullness.So its a decision of pure conscience that Christ's spirit/heart has instilled in us...'To which I replied..The issue is simple, please do not mix religion and politics. They are like oil and water..law of the land as far as is concerned now in any 'developed nations' stands/goes with all its citizens, be it gays/lesbians/liberals/conservatives..it does not matter..is the fact. Understood well by the Anglicans in advance, and see where it leads them into, when they mixed religion and politics..give what belongs to God and what belongs to .... is his teaching right , unless otherwise there is a second Messiah now in his place to be replaced for better sensible reality/practicality..my reasoning begins and ends there. I fully endorse your first sentence and may you be guided by it. The moment any religion spreads Gods, love/wisdom..with fearful pictures/hate speeches ..think its the start of its downfall/decline stage.. Christ did not come to spread hate/fear but spread hope/courage. Please note he did not stand by any parties..and I would expect spiritual leaders to be bipartisan.. not to vote for left/right..it send a wrong signal seeing.. Archbishops/bishops/priests standing in line to cast there votes..its equivalent to travelling with legs put into both boats..what was his teaching again..no man can serve both MAN/GOD..my reasoning again begins and ends there, if practicing in his walk the talk. Whom do they trust then.!? I got an interesting reply as..'Even though there is a separation of Church and state, in a pure sense, this is never possible. Look at past history including the fact as to how David was selected to the throne, to what happens around the world across different religions and cultures, politics and religion are intertwined, like it or not. Saying that faith that leads to trust in GOD and man are for two different things. Voting for election is for an administrative head of a country, who technically will bring humanly leadership on this geographical location. Priests are exercising their right to voice their opinion just as any lay person to exercise this leadership. This has nothing to with whom they trust in or pray too or ask spiritual guidance. Remember, both Church and state are equally capable of governance and both are built for this'.  Towards which I taught the theory of hierarchy is proven right again when concluding with governance/control as the objective of both. Further continued on.. I honestly dream for a day when religious leaders understand their literal vocation in life, in its puristic impractical sense and walk in his/her talk. Very clear as oil/ water no man can serve both God/ Man . Become/choose one is my prayer/dream. Reasoning is limited again per my understanding ..say for example priest xyz stood in line and voted for Tom/Dick/Harry assuming they win with their endorsement to a degree, Tom/Dick/Harry after getting elected does falter in their promises made to get elected.. Who will take up the responsibility.. Surly the man who endorsed/voted for them right!! Does it happen in reality!? So let's leave religion where it should belong, to begin simply without further complication.
    What is clearly being understood after a brief conversation is, we the people understand things in a complicated incomplete manner. Some exploit this opportunity of half backed ideologies and dilute the simple very ideology/philosophy of religion/politics..and as its concepts spread to many, later left to a smart dominant gifted interpreter to his will/interpretation, baked further into a complex sweet delicacy of complexity, with subjects blinking/nodding once head sometimes/often to the point of bloodshed/argument. Losing the simple ideology in the eventual transfer of information amongst the many as Chinese whisper, eventually left without understanding the real simple intention. All religions are built on simple abstract/intangible ideologies, later being perceived  sensitive  simple issues where sensitivity dominates rooting out the simplicity from the equation, always starting with the pure intention of  practicality possibility in mind, to be transferred over/applied with sacrifice and swallow of a trait called ego to majority excess wants/needs, well  knowing its limitations/potential. As to simplify no longer to the full definition of think being defined as, ask is it.. true/helpful/inspiring/necessary/kind. The reasoning and blending of the immiscible begins and ends there, simply explainable as, am I the source/the reflecting object which the word emulsification is all about, to bring in the different together with binding agents added, think over again and ask self am I the.. solute/solvent/emulsifying agent for a common purpose/usE.
.