Monday, September 21, 2015

poOr

     To be, perceived 'poor' holistically, is it.. 'Prioritizing others over ruthlessness'. Thus, the word poor/poverty is left to the translational/interpretational skill of the enlightened so far within their exposed knowledge/ignorance. The holistic/totalitarian definition of being poor is where does one stand materially/physically/mentally(emotionally)/spiritually within these four walls of life/benchmarking of wellbeing. What comes first into the mind/intellect/once ranking position within these listed factors will eventually define the target rating point/the bench marking set so far. To eventually derive a perspective/outlook into  the self worthiness/wellbeing/balanced attribute towards once undertaking/understanding of so called knowledge/wisdom/ignorance. Where economics/statistics so called highlight/derive its knowledge/output  based on different yard sticks thus stipulating/interpreting different meanings to scramble and scatter eventually to ignorantly/intellectually classify the so called rich/poor. Pasting within my thoughts some numbers/interpretations summarized from a so called reliable/unscientific source known as the  Wikipedia.

In terms of physical 'tangible' wealth/debt  per citizens if presumed to be born/living/dead  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_external_debt


    When linked to the 'abstract' happiness/contentment how does one draw parallels, is left to the interpretation of once definition/outlook on wellbeing. Never the less what numbers have to say/speak is listed as happiness  index https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Happiness_Report , thus when linked to emotional/mental/stability factors within self/family members where/when some numbers are available, reflecting some introspective highlighted what ever available to date under the light  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divorce_demography
    When pooling/adding up the first few to come up with something called as the life expectancy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_life_expectancy
  
    Highlighting the role of religious numbers, listing some major religion here in   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_religious_populations . After all what is spirituality/the very essence/foundational dimension to be attributed towards any religion!?
   
    Everything after all at the end depends on the nature of the source/definition intended, based on the national/personal so called yardstick/perspective to eventually define what is poor/rich. Is it an illusion/delusion of some figures playing out to mean anything/nothing after all. What it stipulates is the presumed rich/worthy has the most credits to be paid in terms of economic liabilities/debts than the presumed poor in simple rational/scientific, economic/holistic, spiritual  language in the name of risk, gamble/values, convictions. The ultimate bottom line/underlining sentence is 'much is expected from whom much is given' be materially/physically/emotionally/spiritually to my awareness. To some questions on chicken, egg/lock, key what came/made first is left for interpretations to evolve out into, based on the circumstances/reasoning. Then finally determine what/who is poor/rich when weighed quantitatively/qualitatively considering the listed basic four key/sequence factors as listed above, to unlock the volt/lock is left for individual self to introspect/retrospect and evolve/bloom out into being enlightened/disheartened towards and to further evolve out either towards the best/worst is left as a choice. The fact/logic towards accomplishing/sustaining a  materialistic/ideal relationship status is often easy/nice to start/create/dream big but a struggle to maintain/sustain/persevere which would very often require real strength of character/determination/couragE

No comments:

Post a Comment